피고인의 방어권 행사에 실질적인 불이익을 줄 염려가 없는 한도에서 공소사실을 다듬어 범죄사실을 인정함 피고인은 2012. 6.경 피해자 E과 우연히 알게 되어 피해자에게 자신을 공인중개사무소 전무이사로 소개하고 피해자를 만나던 중 2012. 9.경 전남 고흥에 있는 번지불상의 바닷가 근처 땅을 보여주면서 사실은 위 땅이 자신의 땅이 아님에도 ‘이 중 반은 내 땅이고, 나머지 반은 부동산 사무소 사장의 땅이다’라고 말하는 등 재력을 과시하면서 피해자의 호감을 샀다.

On September 2012, the Defendant presented the victim’s infinite coffee shop at the end of the end of 2012, while showing the infinite contract and the design drawing, the Defendant “to purchase and develop the forests and fields in Chungcheongnam-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-Jin-P

However, the Defendant did not have intended to develop the above forest land, and even if the Defendant had already liveded with the female, it was the only attempt to pay the said forest land to F who was a female living together with the victim as a living expense or as a personal debt, living expense, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, acquired 50 million won from the victim’s side G’s bank account (H) through fraud, and acquired 70 million won in total from 70 times in the name of investment funds in various construction sites, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Connecting accounts; and