When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 26, 2016, around 16:25, the Defendant spited the spit of the victim B (38 years old) in front of the spit of a square tower in Seoul Central District, the unification of Jung-gu, Seoul, where the victim B (38 years old) was seated.

At the time of paying the Si expenses, the victim's chest was fluored by brushing the victim's chest.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing the arrest of flagrant offenders;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 260 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order provides that the Defendant is an act of assaulting and defending against the victimized person, and thus constitutes a legitimate defense.

However, in accordance with each evidence of the judgment, considering the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant spits or spits the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the bees of the victim; and (b) the Defendant

Since it is reasonable to see that the defendant's above assertion is unacceptable.