소유권이전등기
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the principal defendant A shall be revoked;
2. The primary defendant A shall be the plaintiff.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of the facts and the parties’ assertion is as follows, and this part of the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main text of Article
From the second table of the judgment of the court of first instance, the “L cemetery 1,151” under paragraph 2 is regarded as “L cemetery 1,151 square meters.”
The fourth sentence of the first instance court's decision " Q" is advanced into "E".
The fourth part of the judgment of the first instance court, “as it is transcribed into a 329m2” in the 6m2 of the 6m20m2 in the 329m2.
The fourth sentence of the first instance court's decision "(5950 square meters)" is deemed as "(5,950 square meters)".
The fifth sentence of the first instance court's fifth sentence "C" is referred to as "C cemetery".
Part 6 of the first instance court's decision " January 13, 1998" is deemed to be " January 13, 1998 and March 2, 2001."
2. Determination as to the claim against the main defendant A who is the defendant A.
A. 1) Determination on the cause of a claim is presumed to have been completed in accordance with the lawful procedures prescribed by the Act on Special Measures for the Law and thus, it is presumed that the registration of transfer of ownership completed under the Act on Special Measures for the Law is consistent with the substantive legal relationship. Thus, a person who intends to seek the cancellation of the registration of transfer of ownership completed under the Act on Special Measures for the Law must assert and prove that the registration of transfer of ownership was not duly made in accordance with the Act on Special Measures for the Law on Special Measures for the Law on Special Measures, regardless of whether the certificate of guarantee and written confirmation were false or forged, or for any other reason. However, if a guarantee or written confirmation, which forms the basis of the registration, is false, or it has been proved as sufficient to suspect that the substantial contents of the certificate of guarantee or written confirmation, which forms the basis of the registration, are not true, the presumption of the registration shall be deemed to have been reversed, and the degree of proving the falsity of the certificate of guarantee, etc. shall not be sufficiently conviction