2.(a)

Jeju Y farm site 24,056 square meters shall be put up for auction.

A. The Plaintiff and Defendant B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, and M (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Defendant B, etc.”) are the “one land of this case” not exceeding 24,056§³ in Jeju.

B is sharing shares in each share listed in the list of co-owned shares in attached Form 1.

B. The Plaintiff and Defendant N, P, Q, S, T, U, V, and W are the land of this case and the land of this case 15,742 square meters or less in Jeju-si adjacent to the land of this case.

Defendant Q, who owned 1220.861/15,742 shares of the instant land No. 2, had completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said shares to X on January 18, 2017.

Accordingly, the plaintiff and the defendant N, P, S, T, U, V, W, and defendant Q except for defendant Q, and the plaintiff and the plaintiff, "Defendant N, etc."

(C) The co-ownership shares on the land No. 2 of this case are as indicated in the separate shares list of co-ownership 2. C. As to the land No. 1 of this case between the Plaintiff and Defendant N et al. until the closing date of the argument of this case, consultation on each of the division methods on the land No. 2 of this case was not reached between the Plaintiff and Defendant N et al.

2. We examine, ex officio, whether this part of the lawsuit against Defendant Q is lawful.

Inasmuch as a co-owner who filed a partition lawsuit becomes the plaintiff and has become a co-defendant with all other co-owners as co-owners, if the whole share of some co-owners is transferred to a third party during the progress of litigation as to the partition of co-owned property, and the previous party who transferred the co-owned share remains without withdrawal even though the co-owner participated in or participated in the partition lawsuit, the part concerning the previous party who did not withdraw.