However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant found that the rear window next to the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C in B is not corrected, and tried to steal food by entering the above restaurant at night at which the business is completed.

1. On December 12, 2017, at around 22:34, the Defendant: (a) opened a next door and intruded into the said restaurant; and (b) stolen the Defendant’s property worth KRW 17,400 at the market price, such as the victim’s 4 Byung, Macju 4 Byung, Macju 4 Byung, Macju 6, and 1 wing lot.

2. On December 17, 2017, at around 22:18, the Defendant: (a) opened a next door door and intruded into the said restaurant; and (b) stolen the Plaintiff’s ownership with property equivalent to KRW 14,400 at the market price, such as the victim’s 4 Byung, Macju 4 Byung, and 14,00.

3. On December 22, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) opened a next door door and intruded into the said restaurant; and (b) stolen the Plaintiff’s ownership with the property equivalent to KRW 17,400 at the market price, such as the victim’s 4 sick, beer 4 sick, 4 sick, and 1 locker; and (c) 17,400.

4. On December 26, 2017, at around 22:14, the Defendant: (a) opened a next door door and intruded into the said restaurant; and (b) stolen the Plaintiff’s ownership with property equivalent to KRW 14,400 at the market price, such as the victim’s 4 sick, beer 4 sick, and map 2.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on the arrest of the incident, CCTV photographs and written appraisal;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing in Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation [the scope of recommended punishment] : (a) mitigated area (from August to January 6) of the mitigation area (the special mitigated person’s livelihood) / [the decision of sentence] of the mitigated person’s livelihood] ; (b) there is no history of crime; and (c) thefts are alcoholic beverages and foodstuffs.