2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and recognized his mistake, the principle of equity in the case of punishment at the same time with the final judgment of the first head of the criminal facts as indicated in the judgment of the court below, and the fact that the Defendant did not seem to have led the instant crime (one of the counselors who serve as a counselor for the victims to purchase a cell phone by telephone) is favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the crime of this case is a crime causing serious mental and economic damage to many unspecified victims, with a significant social harm, and the crime of this case is committed systematically by many people in accordance with a thorough advance plan, and there is no obvious circumstance in which the defendant made efforts to recover damage, and it does not reach an agreement with the victims, etc. are disadvantageous to the defendant.

Considering the above circumstances and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health conditions, motive, means and consequence of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission of the commission

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.