However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On June 7, 2019, the Defendant, at around 09:41, moved from the first floor of the C-Gun Office in C-A-B to the office of the department in charge of water supply and sewerage in accordance with the direction of the victim E (the age of 48) who is a public official in C-A-V, the Defendant, on June 7, 2019, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the impairment of ear’s character, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment on the left side of the victim.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the guidance on civil petition treatment of public officials, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Articles 136 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the same Act (Article 62 (1) that obstructs the performance of duties by a public official who provides guidance on civil petition treatment and does not put an injury to the quality of the crime that has inflicted an injury, but