except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant driven BSM (SM) 5 vehicles while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.205% at the 0.205%, while under the influence of alcohol on the roads adjacent to the Hansan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City Densan-si Seoul Metropolitan City Densan-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the statutes to the circumstances report on drinking drivers, and the results of the crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (Selection of Imprisonment or Imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and one year and six months;

2. Whether or not to apply the sentencing criteria: Offenses against which the sentencing criteria are small and the sentencing criteria are not set.

3. Two years of the stay of execution in six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a decision of sentence (the background and numerical value of the criminal defendant, the fact that the criminal defendant has no record of fine for the same kind of crime not less than one time before and after the punishment is imposed, the criminal defendant has economic difficulty, the stay of the execution of imprisonment by the public prosecutor and the criminal defendant consent to it, the age and character of