2. Although the judgment of the defendant recognized the instant crime, it is disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor, and the fact that the defendant can have a same criminal record for drinking driving.

In light of the circumstances that have already been favorable to the defendant in the lower court, the lower court’s sentence seems to have been sentenced to discretionary mitigation, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances to be newly considered in the lower court, and in full view of the defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.