폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
The defendant shall be innocent.
On February 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:25 on February 10, 2012, the Defendant: (b) calculated the alcohol value of 30,000 won from the alcohol value of 45,000 won; (c) collected beer disease, which is a dangerous object on his/her customer; (d) 3-4 times the victim’s side c-4 times the victim’s side c-4 loss; and (c) took part of the victim’s side c-4 part of the charge, and took part of the victim’s 4-day treatment to the victim, and 30,000 won, calculated the alcohol value of 45,00 won, and 30,000 won from the alcohol value of 45,00 won.
On the other hand, even though the Defendant did not consistently associate with the Defendant at the time of the instant case from the investigative agency to this court, it was found that the Defendant was influorous with the victim due to the problem of the alcohol value with the victim, and was influoral with the victim, such as fluoring or pushingening the bomb. However, it is argued that the Defendant was not influoral with the victim due to the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object, such as the instant facts charged, and that he was influoral with the victim when 3-4 times the victim’s side fluor was fluoring the victim over the floor, and that he did not
The evidence seems consistent with this, there are some statements in the victim E investigation agency and this court, some statements in the witness F in this court, investigation report (influence report), investigation report (influence report on the medical records), investigation report (influence report on the medical records) and the defendant's investigation agency and court.
First of all, when considering the statement of the victim E, the victim got from the investigative agency to the court of this law one time, and 3-4 times back to the floor of 3-4 times back to the floor of drinking house, and followed by a light, which led to a light of approximately four weeks.