However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant and C are married couple.

On July 18, 2016, at around 00:55, the Defendant and C got off the victim F (23 years old) and the victim G (23 years old) driven by this H while driving in the front of the Seoul Southernbuk-gu D, Seoul, and the front of them.

Accordingly, the defendant, who observed the victim F with the victim F, committed an injury to the victim F by resisting the above victims and H on the ground that he is operating the victim and H in a dangerous manner, by leaving the victim F with the victim F in a mutual vision, sent the victim F with the victim F with the victim's face, making the victim F in a number of times, and caused approximately four weeks of treatment to the victim F with the victim F in a number of times, and caused the injury to the victim F with the inside of about four weeks of treatment. In drinking, the victim F with the face part of the victim G, faced with the wall in the vicinity of the victim G, and caused the victim's body part of the victim G due to drinking and the outbreak of the victim's body part, and caused the victim's stroke and the stroke for the bones of bones 21 day treatment between the victim G and the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against C, F, or G;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. A CCTV-cape and CCTV video CD;

1. Both arms photographs, A photograph, F photographics, and G photograph, such as a hole;

1. Non-Application for punishment;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on medical records, medical records, and medical fees receipts;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Although the degree of injury of the victims for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is serious, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s mistake reflects the Defendant’s depth; (b) the Defendant’s wife on the marriage day is deemed to have been pushed down by the Victim F, and appears to have committed an offense by division; (c) the victims do not want the Defendant’s punishment by mutual agreement with the victims; and (d) the Defendant and C also were