A. The Plaintiff is an insurer that entered into an automobile insurance contract with respect to the A New Flazed Vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), the Defendant Hyundai Flazed Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Hyundai Flazed Vehicles”) in the first instance trial.

B. Around 18:30 on March 1, 2013, the Defendant’s vehicle stopped immediately after entering the right road from the right road to the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the Goyang-si, Goyang-si. Around March 1, 2013, the vehicle at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road. A vehicle at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road at the right road (hereinafter “victimd vehicle”). The Plaintiff’s vehicle following the damaged vehicle stopped

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”). C.

On March 13, 2013, the Plaintiff paid insurance money of KRW 721,880 at the cost of repairing damaged vehicles. D.

On May 27, 2015, the Defendant’s succeeding intervenor acquired the entire business of Defendant Hyundai Cargo Insurance Co., Ltd.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry or video of Gap evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserted that the accident in this case occurred concurrently between the plaintiff's vehicle and the defendant's vehicle's negligence, and that 433,120 won of the insurance money paid by the plaintiff's 70% of the insurance money, but the defendant's successor did not have the obligation to pay the compensation to the defendant's successor, since the accident in this case occurred due to the unilateral negligence of the driver of the plaintiff's vehicle who did not secure the

B. In addition, it is not sufficient to recognize that the Defendant’s vehicle was rapidly suspended solely with the statement of evidence No. 6, and the damaged vehicle behind the Defendant’s vehicle (the driver of the damaged vehicle also uses the expression that the driver was rapidly suspended on the Plaintiff’s vehicle), and the damaged vehicle following the Defendant’s vehicle is on the side.