However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. From around 00:50 on February 17, 2017 to 01:05 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s maternity business by force for about 15 minutes by avoiding any disturbance that prevents other customers from entering the room, such as “I ambling the victim, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I ambling, I am.”

2. Interference with performing public duties;

A. Defendant F, a police officer of the Seogu Seo-gu Police Station E District of the Police Station called out after being reported to the effect that his failure was broken at the above date, time, place, and on 112, had been sent, had the Defendant “Is the soften where the sofar’s house is.”

On the ground that "the F is asked, it was assaulted twice to walk the right direction of the F, thereby hindering the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning public safety and maintenance of order.

B. Around 02:25 on the same day, the Defendant assaulted the police officer’s face at the Seogu Police Station E District of Seogu, Daegu, Daegu, that was in motion to use a toilet due to interference with the performance of official duties, etc. on the ground that the police officer, who was arrested in a flagrant offender and was waiting to use the toilet, “Chose Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma.” and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to F, H, and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs (fields, details of receipt of reports, etc.), copies of public officials' certificates, and copies of work logs;

1. Articles 314(1) (a) and 136(1) (a) (a point of interference with the performance of official duties) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime concerned;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: