However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Suppression;

A. On March 2016, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant, in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the Defendant’s house located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and 102, would have a fluorial relationship with the Victim D.

It is known to it.

Sending a text message stating that “a request to 20 million won” is made;

On March 30, 2016, the defendant's her mother E account was delivered KRW 6 million to the defendant's her mother E account.

B. On April 2016, the Defendant, at the same time, is in Busan, with the victim’s family located in the friendly district in Busan, Daegu, Daegu, Busan.

The project started.

investment in the project is essential.

By sending the e-mail stating "if a person is mobilized, it will be fambling," and sending the victim's hand phone to "to request the payment of money necessary for the business", and sending the victim's text message stating that "the victim would not give money to the victim, but the victim would be informed of the fact that "if he/she does not remit money to the reporter, he/she will inform the reporter of the fact that he/she will inform him/her of the fact that he/she would not give money to the victim at the above defendant's home around May 2, 2016."

On May 4, 2016, the defendant's mother E account was delivered KRW 1 million to the agricultural bank account in the name of the defendant's mother E from the person suffering from frighting damage.

2. On May 10, 2016, the Defendant, who attempted to go to go, sent a text message stating “in cash deposit of KRW 300 million” to the victim’s personal phone at the above Defendant’s home six times during the period from May 10, 2016 to May 16, 2016. On May 14, 2016, the Defendant received only the victim’s money from G hotel located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, but did not receive money from the police officer. However, the Defendant did not go through the wind to arrest the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 350 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and the choice of punishment.