The Defendant did not lend the amount equivalent to KRW 20 million from the victim C over two occasions over the past 1985 and around 1990, and around 193, the Defendant continued to operate the food import business with the victim’s funds while serving as a director of the Co., Ltd. D, which operated the victim, while engaging in the food import business with the victim’s funds.

Around March 196, the Defendant had access to the victim on the part of March 1996, saying, “The Defendant may obtain a large amount of profit from selling in China from the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong operated by the Republic of Korea by purchasing the Republic of Korea Lawsuits, and exporting it to the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong. It would be able to fully pay back all damages caused by this. The E company in Hong Kong located in Hong Kong would not be able to make payments due to its financial nature and sell it to China through that company. The export of the bamboos requires large amount of money. The export of the bamboos to establish the domestic L/C as collateral to purchase the bamboos and export the bamboos to the extent that the lawsuit would be able to purchase the bamboos and export it on credit, and to sell it in China, to have the victim purchase it on the collateral of the domestic L/C, and to have the victim purchase it on the credit market price of the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong located in the Hong Kong located in the Republic of Korea.”

Therefore, the defendant, around July 1997, sold to the victim with "the plaintiff's lawsuit that had been exported, because the original part of the lawsuit that had been exported has good response, so it is well sold in China.

In order to increase the scale of export, the export will gain a larger benefit.

The E company in Hong Kong is also equivalent to one billion won, with self-reliance.