A. The lower court’s sentencing against the Defendants is too unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentencing against the Defendants by the prosecutor is too uncomfortable.

2. Considering the fact that the nature of the instant crime is not good and that the amount of the instant crime is not small, strict punishment against the Defendants is required.

However, considering the following facts: (a) the Defendants divided their mistakes; (b) the Defendants did not have the same criminal record; and (c) the Defendants’ age, sex and environment; (d) motive, means and consequence of the commission of the crime; and (e) the conditions of sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; (b) the sentence imposed by the Defendants is too heavy or unbrupted; and (c) the Defendants and the Prosecutor’s

3. As such, the appeal by the Defendants and the public prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.