However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Around 20:00 on August 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) laid the alcohol to the other male living together with the victim E (the victim, F, and G while drinking alcohol together with the victim, F, and G at the residence of the victim E (the victim E (the victim, the 36-year-old age) who was living together with the victim, and laid the alcohol to the other male living together with the victim.

The Defendant laid the victim’s head in the direction of the victim with the glass bed from the defect of intending to g, and faced with the victim’s head, and inflicted injury on the victim, i.e., the victim’s head and the body of the victim’s head, etc. on drinking, thereby requiring approximately eight weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and G;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. A copy of the service log of the competent police box;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion regarding Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the Defendant and his defense counsel asserted that, although the Defendant at the time, was satisfum, he did not assault the offender or satisfy the victim’s appearance.

According to each evidence, such as the murderer, the victim's statement and diagnosis, etc., the Defendant used violence against the victim, such as the victim’s satisfum, as in the facts charged, and the victim suffered the head and the head of the satfum in the process.

The above assertion is not accepted.

The defendant has been sentenced several times of punishment, and in this case, the defendant does not recognize liability as much as possible, and the nature of the crime is not good.

However, immediately after the case, the defendant made efforts to compensate for damage, such as the payment of medical expenses and part of the amount agreed, the victim got an additional operation on the part of the village, and the criminal complaint was filed due to dispute over the burden of expenses, and is currently in progress in the trial.