도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On October 2, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million and a fine of KRW 4 million from the Jeju District Court as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.
1. A crime on February 2, 2016;
A. A. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) is a person who is engaged in driving of a juice car. On February 2, 2016, the Defendant was a person who is a driver of a juice car, and on February 2, 2016, the driver did not take necessary measures when a traffic accident occurs, such as making a report to the police immediately and preventing danger on the road by organizing non-products, by taking the juice part and the left part of the juice car owned by the victim E, which was parked while driving a juice car in front of the juice car at Seopo-si on February 2, 2016.
B. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a person holding Cjuk passenger vehicles, and the owner of a motor vehicle shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not mandatory insurance.
Nevertheless, the defendant operated Cjuk car which is not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph 1(a).
2. A crime committed on August 1, 2016;
A. On August 1, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.075% from blood transfusions on August 1, 2016, the Defendant driven C juk-c motor vehicle within a section of approximately one kilometer from the front day of the Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si to Seopo-si, Seopo-si, Seopo-si.
B. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages is a person holding Cjuk passenger vehicles, and the owner of a motor vehicle shall not operate a motor vehicle on the road which is not mandatory insurance.
Nevertheless, the defendant operated Cjuk car which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in Section 2(a).
Summary of Evidence
[Judgment No. 1]
1. The defendant's person;