At around 13:00 on May 30, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the “E restaurant operated by the victim D(45 years old) in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, the Defendant: (b) heard the horses, taken the horses into the air conditioning; (c) broken the fluor’s disease in the air conditioning; and (d) broken the said fluor’s disease, which is a dangerous object, caused the victim’s injury, such as damage to the fluor’s left-hand part by the victim at least four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the investigation report and Acts and subordinate statutes governing the scene of damage;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (2-4 years) of the first category (2-year) of habitual injury, repeated injury, and special injury (2-year) is not [the decision of sentence] [the decision of a special person] [the decision of a sentence] is contrary to the defendant's being committed while being committed, the defendant's health is not good, and the defendant is receiving treatment for alcohol addiction, which is favorable to the defendant.

The defendant takes seven times the number of violent force, including one time the probationary power, and the defendant is the sentencing factor that is disadvantageous to the defendant that the defendant did not agree with the victim or take measures for the recovery of damage. The defendant is the sentencing factor that is disadvantageous to the defendant that fuckbucks and spacks are very poor and dangerous to the victim's fuckbucks and spacks.

Other conditions of sentencing, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, relationship to victims, and circumstances after the crime, shall be considered.