2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. The Defendants’ medical records 1) Plaintiff A had difficulty in viewing the left side on April 21, 2010, and Defendant F’s H bill operated by Defendant F (hereinafter “Defendant F’s member”).

(3) Defendant F was given medical treatment from Defendant F. At the time, Defendant F diagnosed the left eye of the snow, diagnosed it as a gymal nuclear back, and prescribed the crymosis amount, etc. (hereinafter “first medical treatment”).

(2) On August 19, 2010, Plaintiff A complained of his/her vision and pains, and received treatment from Defendant G, who is an employee of Defendant F.

At the time, Defendant G diagnosed as an saccine infection by the left side of the State’s diagnosis, a secondary diagnosis, and other saccine infections, and recommended to visit again three (3) days after prescribing three (3) days of saccine catum catum catum catum catums, which are treatment chemicals for saccine infections, etc.

(3) On September 11, 2010, Plaintiff A received medical treatment from Defendant G by finding out the Defendant Council member of the Ansan-gu (hereinafter “Secondary Medical Treatment”). At the time, Defendant G recommended the Plaintiff to visit again two weeks after prescribing the medication. At the time, Plaintiff A’s correction eyesight of the eye of the left eye was 0.08, but 0.08. (b) On September 27, 2010, Plaintiff A received medical treatment at the I Hospital on September 27, 2010, and medical personnel at I Hospital diagnosed the Plaintiff as hypt.

Accordingly, the plaintiff A was performed with respect to the gymbage, such as free physical therapy, at the Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital on the same day.

2) At present, the Plaintiff’s correction trial force is 0.05 and it is difficult for the Plaintiff to improve his/her ability in the future. C. The Plaintiff’s husband, Plaintiff D, C, and E are children of Plaintiff B. [The Plaintiff’s grounds for recognition: (a) the Plaintiff’s husband, Plaintiff’s D, C, and E are without dispute; (b) the Plaintiff’s husband, Nonparty 1 through 6; (c) evidence A1 through 11; (d) evidence A19; and (e) the Plaintiff’s evidence A1 are not recognized as the authenticity of the electronic medical record against A; and (e) there is a possibility