모욕
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On August 6, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 23:45 on August 6, 2017, the summary of the facts charged: (b) there are approximately 10 persons, such as customers E and F, who receive a request to request from the victim D who is the owner of the business, for the reason that the said request is too slick; (c) while working and drinking in the first floor C restaurant of the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Government building B, Seo-gu, Incheon; (d) whether the Defendant is superior to the Defendant:
Customer is king.
The victims were openly insultingd by expressing that “the year of the conclusion of the judgment,” “the day of the judgment,” “the day of the judgment,” and “the day of the judgment.”
2. Determination
(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 311 of the Criminal Act;
(b) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act.
C. Declaration of withdrawal of complaint: On May 4, 2018, after the institution of public prosecution of this case, a letter of withdrawal of complaint was submitted to the court.
(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;