When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. At around 01:00 on June 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was requested to calculate the drinking value by the victim D, an employee, at least in the time of drinking alcohol; (b) “this son’s wrong determination of the person; and (c) me show what she is the imprison.

“The victim’s main business operation was obstructed by force for about 30 minutes by putting the disturbance, such as putting the beer’s disease on the wall, putting the beer’s disease on the wall, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business operation.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the time, place, and upon receiving a report from the Defendant on the Defendant’s failure as above, and was urged to return home from the sloping F, etc. belonging to the Incheon Samsan Police Station Earnsan Police Station Eargu, Incheon, Busan, which called the site, and “Is the instant son are under tax payment, and Is the Defendant will do this act.

“,” and “the name of the Secretary is 20

Does it be an organized violence

"" and "I am off the clothes of a person on the same stroke," and assaulted the cell phone used by "I am off the stroke of the above slope F, knife the knife by hand, knife the knife by hand with the face of the above slope F.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of police reports and the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 316(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties), and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shows the attitude of recognizing and reflecting the Defendant’s crime, the primary offender, the exercise of the force is relatively minor, and the agreement with the victim of the crime of interference with the execution of official duties.