The defendant pays 430,000,000 won to an applicant for compensation.

The above compensation order shall be.

The sentencing of the court below (six years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

On the other hand, the defendant asserts that all of the crimes of this case were led to the confession of the crime of this case, and that there was no record of criminal punishment in addition to a fine once around 1979, the defendant was favorable to the defendant. However, although the crime of this case was committed in spite of the fact that the defendant did not have been fully involved in D auction, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victims to take proceeds through a successful bid, and it is not good to commit such crime, and there is little amount of damage, and the defendant did not receive any refund after using the money or investing in tinsan Development Project. However, the part of the investment in tinsan Development Project is argued that most of it was made in cash, and it is difficult to believe that there was no evidence to recognize that the victims were making efforts to recover the money, and even though the victims were extremely damaged by the crime of this case, the victims did not make efforts to recover damage up to the judgment of the court, and the victims were strongly punished, and the circumstances and circumstances of the crime of this case, the circumstances and circumstances of this case, and the sentencing after the crime of this case.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since there is no ground for appeal of the defendant, and the part concerning the amount of KRW 430 million by deceitation of the applicant for compensation among the application for compensation order filed by the applicant for compensation who has been raised in the trial at the trial is reasonable, and therefore, the defendant shall be ordered to compensate for it in accordance with Articles 25 (1) and 31 (1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, and the above order is