beta
(영문) 춘천지방법원원주지원 2014.06.03 2013가단5618

손해배상(자)

Text

1. On May 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) to Plaintiff A KRW 43,296,775 won; (b) to Plaintiff B, and C, KRW 1 million; and (c) to each of the said money.

Reasons

The fact that D is liable for damages, on May 16, 2012, driving a EM7 vehicle (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”) and driving a road in front of the GF located in the Gangseo-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Gangseo-gu with a view to a chilling area from a cell site, while driving a H OE (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”) driven by the Plaintiff A following the HOE (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”).

Plaintiff

A left to the left to enter the road left on the left side of the above road, and D, at that time, proceeded with the opposite vehicle beyond the center line of the yellow domin line in order to pass ahead of the above road, and it was shocked by the right-hand part of the vehicle of this case to the right-hand part of the vehicle of this case.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant accident”) Plaintiff A suffered from injury, such as a structural injury on the left-hand side, due to the instant accident, and was hospitalized in the original cycle hospital.

The Defendant is an insurer who entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract for the instant car with D, and the Plaintiff C and B are children of Plaintiff A.

[Reasons for Recognition] Fact-finding, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 3-1, Eul evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2-1, Eul evidence No. 2-8, and the purport of the pleadings are as follows: according to the above fact-finding facts, the road where the accident in this case occurred is the road on the left side, and there is a possibility that the moving vehicle may turn to the left, and D is followed by the Ortoba in this case. Thus, although there was a duty of care to properly cut down the speed and prevent the collision by allowing the driver of Ortoba in advance to get out of the way of his overtaking, even though D was negligent and went to the left, D is liable to compensate the plaintiffs for damages caused by the accident in this case.

No. 2 shall limit liability.