손해배상(의)
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff, at the Cental clinic operated by Defendant B (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Medical Center”), performed human treatment, care, etc. from Defendant B, and performed commuting treatment, etc. at the Central University Hospital operated by the Central University of Education (hereinafter “Defendant School”) (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”).
B. The Plaintiff’s previous treatment details 1) on January 25, 2006, the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Defendant Council for Love No. 18 of Loves No. 18, and Defendant B implemented the above Lovesing to the Plaintiff. The Defendant B conducted the Defendant’s motion pictures on February 4, 2006. (2) On May 26, 2006, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as the right bank cancer at the Defendant Hospital as the right bank cancer at the Defendant Hospital on May 29, 2006. (3) On May 29, 2006.
On June 2007, the Plaintiff was confirmed to transfer to the right side of the Defendant hospital. From the medical staff of the Defendant hospital, the Plaintiff took effect of the cryp chemical cryption in three times on July 2007, October 2007, and around January 2008, on three occasions, respectively. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 20310, Jun. 17, 2008>
C. 1) On March 16, 2009, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant Council at the Defendant Council’s address No. 36 on the left-hand side of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant B applied to the Plaintiff for a shooting of the Daegu radiation at No. 36,37 on the left-hand side, and then left the Plaintiff at No. 36 on the left-hand side. Defendant B explained on April 16, 2009, the possibility of the Plaintiff’s suffering from the negoriic treatment due to the negoriic exposure to Daegu No. 36 on the left-hand left-hand side of the Plaintiff on April 25, 2009.
3) On February 23, 2011, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Council member, and Defendant B had the Plaintiff take a photograph and softing. 4) On February 28, 2011, Defendant B carried out a rashing on the Plaintiff’s left Haak No. 36, the left Haak, and on March 10, 201, Defendant B carried out a nashing to the Plaintiff.
The details of the examination and treatment at the defendant hospital.