However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 23, 2014, around 01:15, the Defendant: (a) in the main stairs of “D” located in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant was asked about whether or not he would pay the drinking value on several occasions from the police slope F (39 years of age) belonging to the Incheon Southern Police Station E zone, which was dispatched after receiving 112 a report; (b) in the above F, the Defendant was fluorous at a large amount of flusium, namely, “Cp, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort, fluort,” and fluoring the above F into the face, facing the wall.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to F and G;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area of the obstruction of performance of official duties (6 to 1 year and 4 months) (no person who has been specially punished] [decision of sentence], the fact that there is no force of violence from 2001 to 200, the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and the result thereof, and the various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, shall be determined as ordered.