beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고정77

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On July 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Jung-gu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 16, 2016.

[2] From May 13, 2016 to June 7, 2016, the Defendant sent a message to the effect that he/she may engage in commercial sex acts with a female member in Thailand from May 13, 2016 to from June 3, 2016, the Defendant engaged in commercial sex acts, such as sending a message to the effect that he/she may engage in commercial sex acts with a female member in C, D, E, and F, which is a smartphone, and allowing a large number of unspecified male customers who reported and contacted with the message to engage in commercial sex acts, and allowing him/her to engage in commercial sex acts with a female member in commercial sex acts at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A copy of the passport and on-site photographs;

1. Previous convictions as stated in the judgment: the application of statutes to the judgment of the District Court 2015 High Court 2015 High Court 4149, High Court 2016 High Court 2016 High Court 881, High Court 2015 High Court 2015 High Court 4149, High Court 2016 High Court 881);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Mediation, etc. of elective sexual traffic for facts constituting an offense and Article 19 of the Act on the Punishment of such Acts;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The principle of equity is taken into account when a judgment on the record of the crime as stated in the reasoning of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is rendered concurrently with a crime for which a final judgment has become final and conclusive, but a fine under a summary order is imposed in light of the content and period of the instant crime, the Defendant’s previous conviction, etc.

As such, the sentence shall be determined as ordered.