beta
(영문) 대전지방법원논산지원 2017.08.23 2016가합2420

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 23:00 on August 21, 2016, the Plaintiff’s ASEAN obtained the part of the left clean interest from F, who carried on alcoholic beverages together at the E restaurant in Masan-si, Ansan-si, with an empty beer’s disease.

D The 119 first responded to the 119 emergency rescue, and the 119 first respond to the site was sent to the Defendant medical corporation B after having taken first aid by examining the patient status on the same day at around 23:26.

Emergency medical service workers at the time recorded the conditions of patients and emergency medical services as the condition A (Allert, life cards), the conditions of the dynamic response, blood pressure of 120/80m Hg, patient classification: diving response, State lake and marsh: 0.5m (at the head head head head head) l/w. 0.5m (at the head head head head head, there is a heat of 0.5m), and the head heading treatment: Mesting and Mesting.

(b) D has arrived at the Emergency Center of G Hospital at around 23:38 on the same day.

An emergency medical technician who worked in his place was examined the two sides of D, but failed to discover the heat.

At around 23:42 on the same day, Defendant C, who was a doctor on duty, had heard the circumstances of the accident from the 119 first responder and examined D, but did not discover the heat.

At the time D was a brupt, and blood pressure was 150/100m Hg, and the defendant C also maintained a record that the patient's food condition is indicated as A (Aller, Masters, and Masters) during four stages, and that the LOC is not clear.

C. At around 23:48 on the same day, Defendant C prescribed a video examination (durings, scopic radiation shooting, and cT shooting) on D, but at around August 22, 2016, the following day, when the patient’s side (the person who is the patient or the guardian of the patient) refuses the examination, Defendant C revoked all of them and instructed the discharge.

Defendant C also left the record that the patient’s refusal to inspect the patient was recorded, and that the symptoms were good and returned to Korea.

D At the Ka Center's office that operates discharge sentence with type I and type B, D was dead due to cryposis damage around 06:00 on August 22, 2016.

As a result of the autopsy, approximately 2.0 on the left side of the floor of the head of the head.