Around 14:00 on April 19, 2012, the Defendant stated the following false facts to the effect that “F was dismissed from the audit office due to the absence of the board of representatives without permission, the unlawful recording of the board of representatives, the preparation of unfair audits and audit reports, the unfair pressure exercise of the board of representatives, the obstruction of fair voting and the involvement in the appointment of the construction supervisor, and the involvement in the payment of remuneration to the tenant subcommittee,” and distributed them to the members, thereby impairing the reputation of the victim F.

B. The Defendant continues to deliver to the other party to a lawsuit (G) the revocation of the authorization for establishment of a partnership through the documents to be discarded by the partnership 1. at an ordinary general meeting of the C&A meeting held at the same time and place as the above paragraph (a);

(b)the exercise of pressure to select himself as a construction supervisor, even though he is a non-professional in construction;

3. Giving serious adverse effects on the partnership business by carrying out litigation difficulties by having the other party to the lawsuit (G) and the reporters related to the revocation of the revocation of the authorization for establishment of the partnership in the partnership office and submitting it as litigation material, and raising negative perceptions to the authorizing and permitting office and the general buyers;

4. The acts of violation of duties as a general secretary, such as by receiving a partial refund of commission fees from an I attorney-at-law in charge of the redevelopment association's litigation and by granting at will the 10 million won to the J, the father of the redevelopment association, and by granting at will the 4 million won to some directors, each of which is the 4 million won to the directors, theft documents kept in the partnership's office and then transmitting them to G, who instituted multiple lawsuits against the partnership to interfere with redevelopment project.