A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for two years and six months, respectively.

However, from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, Defendant.

1. Defendant A, who is a foreigner of Vietnam, was aware of the same nationality as that of the victim B(32).

On April 19, 2016, the Defendant sent a message to the Defendant stating that “If a person was male, who was in an internal relationship with Vietnam migrant female, was not the victim of the damage on April 15:48, 2016, he/she had the examination of the above E, the Defendant sent the victim a message with the content that “if the victim was male, he/she would have the male response.”

Although the victim did not recognize the fact that he had examined E, the knife knife knife knife knife knife

The message was sent and received from the injured party the message that “I am on the bridge at 10 times” was “I am on the bridge.”

Thus, the defendant thought that the victim will die with knife with the victim, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Therefore, although the defendant tried to kill the victim, he attempted to do so, but he did not commit an attempted crime by going about about four weeks of medical care.

2. Defendant B, who is a foreigner of Vietnam, was aware of the same nationality as the victim A (3).

On April 19, 2016, the Defendant denied the Defendant’s receipt of a message from the victim who thought that the Defendant was not making an examination to the victim and the interested parties E, through F Messen, “If the Defendant had a male response, I would be able to admit him/her to have a male response,” and instead, denied the Defendant’s receipt of a written examination from the victim and the interested parties.