Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 50.

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in liquefied petroleum gas sales and quality control as the director of a limited liability company B located in the old Military Service D.

A liquefied petroleum gas dealer is not allowed to sell liquefied petroleum gas that falls short of quality standards. However, on May 2, 2013, the Defendant sold liquefied petroleum gas that does not meet the quality standards under the condition that the hydrocarbon content is 13mols by violating the hydrocarbon content standard at the above place by not more than 10mol%.

2. The Defendant B, at the same time and time as the above paragraph (1), committed the above violation in relation to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A certificate of inspection results of liquefied petroleum gas quality and collection of liquefied petroleum gas;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Article 48 subparagraph 7 of Article 48 and Article 25 (3) of the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act; and Article 51, Article 48 subparagraph 7 of the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act; and Article 25 (3) of the Safety Control and Business of Liquefied Petroleum Gas Act;

1. Defendant A of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act