When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the ‘gal-sex disorder and the type of illness'.

At around 07:00 on October 16, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbances, such as an empty stuffs, leafletss, garbages, and wastes that were at a convenience store at the end of the city, and a fall down on the floor of the display products.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 10 (2) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.