유가증권위조등
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 8 months and for not more than 2 months as to a crime set forth in the judgment of the defendant.
In this case.
Punishment of the crime
On July 8, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment by the Incheon District Court for a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 6, 2015.
In the case of a defendant, at the cost of Suwon District Court on June 11, 2015, sentenced two years of suspension of the execution of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in six months, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 20, 2016. However, the criminal facts of the judgment finalized are committed in around the around the day, 2012, and all the criminal facts of the judgment that became final and conclusive as a violation of the Illegal Check Control Act have been committed, and the criminal facts of the judgment, which became final and conclusive, are committed before November 23, 2015, and it does not constitute a case where a judgment can be sentenced simultaneously with the crime of subparagraph 2 of the judgment that became final and conclusive on May 16, 2014 (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2013Do
1. 2015 high group 7562;
A. On January 28, 2013, the Defendant: (a) stated that there is a forgery or forgery of securities; (b) stated that there is a resident number “G”; (c) address address H. H.; and (d) name I’s employee identification number at the back end of a promissory note issued by E in the Defendant’s future at the Seosung-si of Gyeonggi-do, Inc., Ltd.; (d) “F”, “27,50,000,000 won”; (b) May 28, 2013 on the date of payment; and (c) exercised a forged promissory note for the purpose of exercising the rights and duties of a promissory note, which was kept in custody upon request of the victim I under a construction contract; and (d) affixed an endorsement under the name of E with respect to the rights and duties of the promissory note, which was issued by E; and (d) exercised a forged promissory note with the intention of exercising the rights and duties of E, at that time, providing it to J.
B. Around August 2013, the Defendant is a person who lends the name of K to the Defendant, and substantially operates “M” in the period of harmony.
On March 19, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for the facility leasing (lease) of NA5-A car owned by the damaged person in the name of K at the place of business of 15-9, Manyang-gu, Manyang-gu, Manyang-gu, 85-9, Manyang-gu, Manyang-gu, 85-9, and was kept for the injured person while using the said car. < Amended by Act No. 11848, May 14, 2013>