Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

가. 사실 오인 이 사건 공소사실 중 특수 폭행의 점에 관하여, 피고인은 깨어진 경광 봉 부위로 피해자를 때린 사실이 없고, 단지 피고인이 경광 봉을 주변에 내리치면서 깨진 경광 봉 파편이 피해자에게 튄 것일 뿐이다.

B. The sentence of the lower court (an amount of KRW 5,00,000) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the records of this case’s judgment ex officio, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for two years, etc. with Suwon District Court 2016No. 8271 on February 9, 2017 due to forced indecent act, etc., and the above judgment can be acknowledged by the Supreme Court on April 14, 2017 as the final appeal became final and conclusive.

Therefore, the crime for which judgment has become final and conclusive and each of the crimes of this case shall be sentenced to punishment for each of the crimes of this case by taking account of the equity in the case where the judgment is to be rendered simultaneously in accordance with the main sentence of Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, inasmuch as the crimes of this case are concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the judgment of the court below cannot be maintained.

However, the defendant's assertion of mistake of facts is still subject to a trial by this court, notwithstanding the above reasons for reversal of authority.

B. The following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court’s duly admitted and investigated evidence regarding the assertion of mistake of fact: ① The statement submitted by the victim to an investigative agency immediately after the crime of the special assault in this case was flicked by the Defendant at a price at one time the victim’s flickum.

기재되어 있는 점, ② 이 사건 당일 촬영된 피해자의 피해 부위 사진에 의하면, 피해자의 턱 부위에 뾰족 한 물건으로 찔린 듯한 상처가 확인되는데, 위와 같은 사진의 형상은 부서진 경광 봉으로 턱 부위를 맞았다는 위 피해자의 진술과도 일치하는 점, ③ 피고인이 경찰에서 조사 시 깨진 경광 봉을 휘두르면서 그 경광 봉에 피해자의 턱 부위가 1회 맞았다고

(f) a statement;