A. On March 12, 2017, the Plaintiff, Defendant, and E’s mother-friendly net F, sold G Apartment Hdong I (hereinafter “G apartment I”) to J for KRW 210,000,00 in the purchase price.

B. On April 11, 2018, the network K, as the Plaintiffs, Defendant, and E’s reference, sold the said G apartment L (hereinafter “G apartment L”) owned by itself to M in KRW 180,00,000.

C. The deceased on November 1, 2018, and the deceased on September 19, 2019.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, 7, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The defendant received KRW 210,00,000 from the seller directly or through the networkF from the seller. The defendant alleged that only 157,00,000,000 out of the purchase price of G apartment I was donated to the seller, but the contract deposit of KRW 8,00,000 out of the purchase price of G apartment I was paid to the defendant's financial account, and the intermediate payment of KRW 15,00,000 was deposited into the net Financial Account on April 10, 2017, but the money of KRW 20,000 was remitted to the defendant's account on April 13, 2017, and the remainder was used as the purchase price of N apartment I, and thus, the defendant received KRW 157,00,000,000 from the sale price of the above 40,000,000,000 from the remainder of the purchase price of the above 20,010.

. Accordingly, the network F shall be the Defendant.