A shall be punished by a fine of 50,000 won, and a fine of 300,000 won, respectively.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

B is the chairman of the council of occupants' representatives of Seo-gu Daejeon D Apartment, and the defendant A is the same representative of the above apartment.

1. Defendant B, around March 20, 2013, at the above apartment management office around 19:30 on March 20, 2013, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by saying, “this shall be fright,” among the victims, including the victims E, who were in dispute with the victim A among the council of occupants’ representatives, and are hearing about 8 persons, such as the same representative E.

2. At around 18:00 on March 27, 2013, Defendant A, at the above apartment building 205, sent a letter to the victim B, stating the following reasons, “The Defendant mobilized 10 students, and sent it to the university bulletin board or entrance door, each site, at the debate room of the 1164 generation, it is possible for residents to walk with 1164 generation.” The Defendant her behavior toward width is gathering any form. Drhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol of the police interrogation of the defendant B (including the part concerning the questioning of the defendant B);

1. Statement of each police statement related to A and B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing Intimidation photographs;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act; Selection of fine

B. Defendant A: Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant B’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act stated the same remarks as the facts charged to Defendant B, but it was sufficiently dead and has been contingent on A’s conduct, and thereafter, it constitutes a justifiable act that does not violate the social rules.

The expression "this must be changed" for a person who is older than the defendant is an expression of an abstract judgment or a dissatisfic sentiment that could undermine the social evaluation of the person.