폭행
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is as follows: (a) the Defendant only laid the victim’s breath in a breath’s breath when she dump, and did not depict the victim’s breath; (b) and (c) the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged in the instant case. Therefore,
2. The following facts revealed by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court below, namely, that the defendant and the victim were parked as a parking problem, and the victim reported to 112 the victim's franchising and bathing the franchising, and the police officers dispatched upon 112 reported 112 reported 112 reported 4 times the victim's franchising. The defendant also recognized the victim's franchising, and the defendant also recognized the fact that franchising the victim's franchising, such as franchising the franchis, even in the situation where the police officers dispatched after 112 reported franchising the victim's franchising, and in itself, it constitutes an assault as stated in the facts charged.
Even if the victim had committed an act of assault, such as taking time expenses, etc., before the victim’s desire, it cannot be justified for the Defendant to commit the instant crime.
Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.