2. In the process of judgment on the job site, the crime was considerably poor considering the details of and degree of damage to the victim’s serious wound, such as fingers, and the recidivism during the period of repeated crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.

However, in full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, family environment, etc., the sentence of the lower court is within the reasonable discretionary range, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant led to a contingent crime on the ground that the Defendant is led to the Defendant’s confession of and against the offense; (b) the Defendant’s verbal dispute has been brought about; and (c) the fact that the lower court agreed with

It can not be seen as an unreasonable degree because it is too unfluened.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.