However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2019. 5. 29. 01:50경 천안시 서북구 B아파트 C동 앞길에서 술에 만취하여 자신을 귀가시키던 천안서북경찰서 D지구대 소속 경장 E이 있는 자리에서 자신의 모친인 F의 뺨을 2회 때려, 이를 본 E이 모친에 대한 폭행을 제지하자 위 E의 빰을 2회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing victim photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. The scope of the recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines [decision of types] of the obstruction of performance of official duties: [Type 1] No person shall be subject to the obstruction of performance of official duties or coercion of official duties [the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] (the scope of recommended areas and recommendations] basic area, six months to one year and six months;

2. Consideration, such as the exercise of force by a police officer directly to a person who has rendered a decision on a sentence of punishment, being adverse to the nature of the crime, being punished by a fine once for the same crime in 2015, and having no record of crime exceeding a fine;