2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The Plaintiff received KRW 67,96,215 on the date of distribution of the real estate compulsory auction procedure by Seoul Northern District Court C, Seoul Northern District Court C, based on the judgment such as the deposit, etc., Seoul Northern District Court 2012Ga2130 against the Plaintiff. Since the Defendant’s claim against the Plaintiff pursuant to the above judgment has already ceased to exist due to its extinguishment, the Defendant asserted that the distribution against the Defendant is unreasonable, and filed a lawsuit of demurrer against the Defendant.

Where a debtor raises an objection against a distribution schedule prepared in the distribution procedure, a debtor who has raised an objection against a creditor who has an executory exemplification of a claim shall file a lawsuit of demurrer against a creditor (Articles 256 and 154(1) and (2) of the Civil Execution Act), and the lawsuit of demurrer against a creditor who has an executory exemplification is deemed unlawful (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Da72464, Apr. 14, 2005). Since the plaintiff, the debtor of the distribution procedure, raises an objection against the distribution against the defendant, who is the creditor having an executory exemplification of the executory exemplification, the plaintiff, as the debtor of the distribution procedure, files a lawsuit of objection against the defendant, and thus, the lawsuit of objection against a distribution is unlawful.

Therefore, the instant lawsuit is dismissed.