A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

1. Around May 5, 2014, the Defendant assaulted Defendant A’s assaulted against the victim D (the age of 18) and the victim E (the age of 19) on May 5, 2014, on the following grounds: (a) on the first floor of Ansan-si’s members CFra; (b) on the ground that he saw D to be “the same bitch,” he was frighted, he was fluored by the fluor of the above D’s fluor; and (c) on the ground that he sawd the fluor’s fluor, he was fluored by the fluor and the victim E (the age of 18) on the fluor; and (d) on the ground that the fluor was fluored,

2. The Defendant’s obstruction of the performance of official duties committed an assault by the Defendant on the ground that, upon receiving the above report of the above E 112 from the Defendant, the police box of the Ansan-gu Police Station, which was dispatched to the front of the above CFra, he heard the victims of the injury, and notified the Defendant of the grounds, etc. for arrest to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender of the crime of assault, and that, in doing so, the Defendant used the Defendant’s obstruction of the performance of official duties, the Defendant, by hand, assaulted the victim of the Sewol ferry on his her flaps, by taking advantage of the flap’s blaps.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of order of police missions and legitimate execution of duties for criminal investigation.

3. On May 5, 2014, at around 23:05, Defendant B, at the police box of the Ansan-si Police Station of the Ansan-si located in Ansan-si, the Defendant: (a) discovered a disturbance to interview the above A, and committed assault to Defendant B, who instructed the Defendant out of his office, by taking a bath to the police officer belonging to the said police box, who called the “neep”, and used the said police box to walked twice.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the maintenance of police officers' order and legitimate execution of duties for criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, D, G, and I;

1. Application of the victims' photographs and video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;