At around 15:45 on September 6, 2018, the Defendant prescribed 3 days of notification to medical prison D and correctional officers E (Nam, 39 years of age) affiliated with the medical institution D and public health care in the medical institution B’s office.

E rejected to the effect that the E wishes to continue to prescribe, he would receive medical treatment and receive a prescription.

While the Defendant continuously raised an objection, the Defendant, at the price once a drinking part of the left face of E, and at the price of the back water and the head part of E with both drinking, inflicted an injury on the Defendant, such as “brine without any heat in two parts,” which requires treatment for about two weeks by damaging E to the ground.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of prison officers on the medical management of prisoners, and at the same time injured the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement of the F, G, H, and E;

1. Each service report;

1. Investigation report (the medical certificate of injury of a victim);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reports (CCTV image photographs);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing selective sentence of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. One month to seven years from imprisonment with prison labor within the applicable range of punishment by law; and

2. Scope of recommendations according to the sentencing criteria;

(a) The aggravated element of the crime of bodily injury (determination of type) and the general injury (general injury): In the case of obstruction of performance of official duties, [decision of the recommended area] the aggravated area / [decision of the recommended area] the aggravated area / six months of imprisonment or two years (in the case of blocking the crime of bodily injury, where the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties is accompanied by the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, it shall not be treated as a majority crime, and it shall be treated as the sentencing factor only for the crime of

3. The Defendant appears to have an attitude to recognize and reflect his/her fault instead.

The defendant suffers from a mental disease, such as a decentralization disorder.