On September 7, 2012, the Defendant, at around 09:29:29, consulted with the victim in the first floor counseling room of "E" working for the victim C victim D in Busan-gu, Busan-gu, which is a matter of termination of the contract. On the ground that it is bad for the victim to go alone, the Defendant expressed his/her desire to "Chose" as "Chose" on the ground that he/she is not matched, and damaged property equivalent to KRW 610,000 in total by gathering one computer and computer monitors, etc. on the floor managed by the victim, and destroying the property equivalent to KRW 380,000 in total.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of police suspect regarding D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (a written estimate of damage and capture on the surface of the crime);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 366 of the Selection of Punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of the inducement in a workhouse, 50,000 won a day);

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that the defendant has no criminal record of the same kind of crime, the defendant reflects his