A. On March 2, 2011, the Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement between a paper truck company and a paper truck company on March 2, 201 with respect to a Class A 14 tons of car truck owned by the said company (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on March 2, 2011 to March 2, 2011. The Defendant is a motor vehicle maintenance business entity that repaired a counterpart vehicle due to the Plaintiff’s accident as follows.

B. B, around 22:05 on August 18, 201, driven the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and driven the front side of the Domoel road, which is located in C at the time of drinking water, due to the mistake that the safety distance was not secured, while driving along one lane among the two-lane roads at the right side from the upstream of the river at the right side, and led the fire-fighting vehicle to receive the center separation zone for the left side of the fire-fighting vehicle and transfer it to the right side.

C. From August 23, 2011 to November 29, 2011, as a fire-fighting vehicle was destroyed due to the foregoing traffic accident, the Defendant repaired the front and the lower body frame of the fire-fighting vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “vehicle part repair”) and the part excluding the front and the congested pumps and the congested roll, etc. among the fire-fighting devices (hereinafter referred to as “fire-fighting device repair” in this part by referring to the repair of this part), and the G operating the “F” repair of the fire-fighting vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “F repair” in this part by referring to its repair”). D.

On the other hand, even though the fire-fighting officer, who is the manager of a fire-fighting vehicle, requested the delivery of a fire-fighting vehicle, upon completion of the repair of the fire-fighting vehicle and the plaintiff guaranteed the payment of the repair cost, the defendant rejected the delivery of the fire-fighting vehicle on the ground that the repair cost has not been paid. As the plaintiff, the defendant, and G are in conflict with each other, the plaintiff, the defendant, and the defendant around December 5, 201.