Examining the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, it is justifiable to have determined that the lower court convicted the Defendant of both the robbery and the violation of the law of defense, among the facts charged in the instant case, on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the suspension of prescription, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the suspension of prescription.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.