The judgment below

Although examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s judgment that found the instant facts charged guilty on the grounds stated in its reasoning did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine or omitting judgment, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of

And it is not necessary for the court to adopt the application for evidence at the discretion of the court.

The court below rejected the defendant's application for appraisal because it may not be examined when deciding the person (see Supreme Court Decision 2010Do7947, Jan. 27, 201, etc.).

Even if the court below erred by infringing on the defendant's right to defense in the litigation

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.