beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2017.06.23 2016고단246

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On December 15, 2014, a person who registered a general game providing business operator (registration number: E) and installed a game room with the trade name of “G” on the F and fourth floor of Goyang-gu F and Goyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, and operates the game room. Defendant A is a person who receives 15% of the profit as a pre-service member of the said large game room and manages the head of the said game room.

In the event of inserting KRW 10,00 from 1,00 to 10,00 in the game material, points are accumulated in the click hold as much as the input amount, if the first-time opening opening opening opening one is opened with the card of KRW 5 at the same time as the betting (100). In the event that the association of the card constituting the trademark is formed, all the pages were classified as a game with the winning, chain, and automatic transmission function.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired, from December 24, 2014 to March 11, 2015, provided the contents of the game product differently from the classification of the rating classification in order to make the result of the game product to be drawn at a certain point after the game was cut out to 100 game machine installed in the above game site.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ partial statements in the first public trial protocol

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers against the defendant A;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each investigation report (including the results of appraisal, the response of the Committee on Water Management of the Game, the response of the control of the Committee on Water Management, and each accompanying material) / [including the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court; ① the game content statement attached to the game of this case at the time of the application for rating classification of the game of this case / i.e., the statement stating that “all screens of the game of this case do not have an example, chain, and automatic playing function”; ② the specific picture is used differently from the contents classified by the game of this case as at the time of the control of this case