When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 5, 2014, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath at the court of Seoul Western District Court No. 307, which is located in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, as a witness of the case, such as assault by the above court No. 2014 High Court 1810 C.

The defendant answers to the question "where the defendant (C) has spited spits or spits to D" by the attorney, and the lawyer's "dos spits or spits" is not subject to the question "(D).

The question of “spits or spits,” so far as there was no spits or pits.

"The witness" of the prosecutor, as the defendant(C), was sent out of the court, and the defendant(C) and D had contact with the defendant(C) until the beginning.

“I have been asked as the case may be.”

Whether the Defendant “(C) is spits or spits the nature of the Defendant, despite that the Defendant’s spits or spits it outside the court.”

“To do so,” the question “I shall not:

“The answer was made in the same manner,” and

Other than a witness who has observed all the parts of the witness

‘Creh' for the question of “I”

"In response, the defendant observed all the pages, but C testified that spit has no effect on D.

However, as of May 13, 2014, C spits off D's face before Seoul Western District Court 306 room located in 174 as Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu, Mapo-gu on May 13, 2014, and the Defendant observed all the pages on D's side.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Trial records, each protocol of examination of a witness, each protocol of examination of a witness (D, A, and E);

1. The Defendant, the husband of the 2014 High Court Decision 2014No1810, denies the crime that is not a spiting against memory because C, which is the husband, failed to witness the spiting of the spiting against D. However, D and E, when C spits spits, the Defendant was immediately next to the Defendant.