Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

On May 5, 2018, at around 17:20, the Defendant assaulted the Victim with Ba (Fran, 75 years of age) in Suwon-si B building C, which had been in dispute with the Victim D (Fran, 75 years of age).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of some Acts and subordinate statutes to D's written statements;

1. Relevant Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part is as follows: (a) at the time and place indicated in the facts charged as indicated in the judgment, the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as a scam, which requires treatment of the victim for about two weeks, by hand.

2. Determination and conclusion

A. First, we examine the part “when her is hered with her hand”.

In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, that is, the victim only stated that the defendant was her face and her face at 4 times a week, and did not state that the victim was her her face at her hand, the victim’s photographs taken the victim’s damaged part also indicate the victim’s damaged part as her part, rather than her buck, and witness E stated that the defendant was her her bomb by hand, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the defendant was her her buck with the victim’s her hand, and there is no other evidence to prove this otherwise.

B. Next, we examine “injury” as follows.

The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, namely, the victim's statement stated that "the victim's face was 4 times a week from the defendant, chin, and chin." However, witness E stated that the defendant was not at the time of drinking the victim as seen earlier, and that the victim's statement was the case.