Seized evidence1 through 15 shall be confiscated from the accused.

The Defendant, along with the Chinese telephone financial fraud assistance staff, conspired to obtain money from many and unspecified domestic unspecified persons by misrepresenting the investigative agencies, such as the Public Prosecutor's Office, by making them deposit money with a nominal passbook. The staff of the telephone financial fraud assistance in China have taken charge of transferring money from China to the designated account by telephoneing the victim from China, and the Defendant has taken charge of transferring money from the money to the Chinese side by withdrawing or withdrawing the amount of damage by using the large passbook sent by the Chinese side according to the direction of the Chinese side.

On July 21, 2014, at least 13:00 on July 21, 2014, a member of the telephone financial fraud assistance service under his name misrepresented that “the account was involved in a fraud case. It cooperates with the investigation. I inform the account information currently being used. I inform the account information. I inform the account information. I inform the account information. I transfer money from the account. I have received 6 million won from the victim to the national bank account in the name of G, and the defendant has withdrawn 5,990,000 won from the IBK Securities Card connected to the above account at the time of cash withdrawal of the Korean bank located in Ansan-dong, Ansan-si, the defendant deposited 5,990,000 won to the national bank account designated by the Chinese telephone financial fraud organization as a member of the Chinese telephone financial fraud organization.”

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victim in collusion with the Chinese telephone financial fraud assistance staff.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Seizure records;

1. Photographs;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. On the grounds of sentencing of Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, the crime of Bosing fraud in the instant case is committed systematically and multiple victims are massed.